A terrible choice by the BBC to combine the two news channels. A lot of technical issues or poor hosts, lower-quality information (i.e., the Radio 5 Live phone show in the middle of the morning), and so on. It's disappointing that they must search different media outlets for information to pay. News is an essential feature for a public-funded broadcaster. It is time to eliminate all the rubbish programs aimed at the 'popular' segment of the market. Ensure that standards are maintained; otherwise, the BBC has no reason to continue paying the worldwide license cost!
I usually go to BBC News mid-morning when I am off at work. What has changed for me? Now we have Nicky Campbell sitting with headphones, talking to an interview on the radio. !!!! It's not a talk show on the phone that I could listen to at the radio station if desired (which isn't the case). !)!! I've never seen the news before 11 am since the switch, and I won't do it from now on!!
I'm looking forward to watching the life stories and the breaking news of the day!
I'm from the United States, as do many of my buddies, and I used to tune into BBC World Service. I'm a native speaker. However, the quality of spoken English has become so poor that I cannot understand the language. My acquaintances who speak English as another language feel it's gone downhill throughout most programs. Many cannot comprehend low-quality English and don't wish to imitate bad accents from other regions. In general, BBC has become a shame, and while we used to enjoy it, we are now opposed to it.
BBC News has become unwatchable and was once the news channel of choice; however, the biases are apparent not just in the content they broadcast but in what they don't say. They are supposed to provide the entire population of its license holders, not only those who want to speak with them.
They should be embarrassed by themselves and all other media outlets causing massive panic buying fuel in the UK with false information. They must hold accountable, together with the other muppets of the media.
I used to believe the B.B.C. news was the standard for independent news reporting. Now, I believethinkact the opposite is true. It's a constant stream of information being pushed out and made appear normal. Shame on you, B.B.C.
They don't think that an invasion is worthy of coverage.
The media is always talking about perceived racism and BLM however, they haven't said anything is said about the thousands of undocumented immigrants who have entered America this year. They don't think that an invasion is worthy of coverage.
I am slightly unhinged. I am a screaming, far-correct mouth breather who likes to hear about things I like and suffers from incontinence and Erectile dysfunction. I also love blaming people from the left, foreigners, or ethnic minorities for all the problems that happen in this world. If there's one thing I don't like about it is hearing different views of others. This is why I am a snob about the BBC and all that it represents. I've also been persuaded to write this review, believing it will have a lite impact and that the average person doesn't care a lot.
The entire media BBC mainly, is awash with negativity and depressing stories and contributes to mental health. The last few years have been highly traumatizing, yet instead of reporting positive news (and there's some positive news), it seems that all they're trying to do is scare people. I'm wondering if this kind of journalistic style (during both world wars) would have led people to beggar their existence instead of in the aftermath of war, where people gathered and were inspired with the help of the media. I pay for a license from a tv company whose programming I don't watch. How can you help people understand instead of making them feel down with your doom-and-gloom reportage?
I used to depend on the BBC news. The first thing I checked each morning was getting a broad overview of the news in the morning in bite-sized pieces. Day, I feel it's more magazine fashion, where people are constantly interviewed on trivia or stories unrelated to actual news events. It's a bit unprofessional. It's boring and always follows the official line, and it is challenging to grasp the meaning of the news during the limited time to spare at the beginning of my day. I have now switched to ITV, which I previously would never have been able to watch. Sorry BBC, but over the past 18 months, BBC breakfast has gone out of its way.
The last time they did get the weather right was Michael Fish and the great storm.
Following the promise of severe weather with thunder and torrential rain in the southwest region, we did not get rain and no thunder. Instead, we sweated another time at 30 degrees. We are looking towards cooling down from the scorching heat. When the weather forecast said we'd be blessed with this gorgeous rainy day, we were grateful to them. It's hard to tell how they managed to get this wrong. The last time they did get the weather right was Michael Fish and the great storm.
These left-wing whinge champagne socialists. Any media organization that claims, "We report our version of the news," should stop operations. Then, BBC I', ve put off paying my BBC fee for propaganda. What are you going to do? Why should I pay the price for this anti-Whitanti-Whitepro-British agenda? I'm looking forward financial smack in the backside coming soon to you, BBC.
A media that is among the worst corrupt media outlets in the world.
A media that is among the worst corrupt media outlets in the world. It is not a reliable source of information. I've been living in the UK for the past three years, and this TV Chanel has me thinking intensely about the media I have in my home country. Unfortunately, my country is one of the countries that were once communist in Europe; therefore, I am sure that I'm terrified about my departure to a nation that isn't much different from any other communist nation across the globe. They have different slogans but the same goal. It's so sad.
DBBC has been through its fair share of bad days. Downright sloppy, just like today, the lady said an unintentional swear word, and the newsreader attempted to stop her, and the video apologized to the viewers. Hoping GB news will take over BBC news. News is a Bias new media that always tries to appear politically correct.
BBC News or BBC generally hasn't been helpful to me in times of need. It. They are selfish, kaminey kutte saale harmi papai, money-spy. I would advise others not to use them. They will. not report your news or any story. They should be treated that way.
BBC news and reportage have not served its use for years
BBC news and reportage have not served its use for years. Instead of following its mission and reporting neutrally, the station is biased and utilizes the platform to push its interests.
The BBC coverage of making an issue that is national in this minor incident.
Unexpectedly, however, BBC news is similar to other for-profit news organizations because their articles are designed to draw attention to the general public rather than necessary information and news. For example, today's extensive coverage of the white/black controversy over a basic written conversation between a white lady and a close friend of royals. Three entities are responsible in the case of the white person not being able to respond appropriately to an appropriate question about the family of a person and their national origins, as well as the black woman not comprehending the issue of the white person, and participating in a transparent investigation, and finally, the BBC coverage of making an issue that is national in this minor incident.
I click news for an update on my tablet. Bbc asks me to sign up or log in to view Coronavirus's update. I have a license and am registered to access players, so I'm telling bbc to should stop! The fact that they are monitoring me on all devices is disturbing. I'll get my news from other sources.
It is a shame that a reliable source has diluted in credibility.
For many years BBC news has been my primary source for reliable news; however, over the past year, I have seen more and more opinion-driven, sensationalized content like the else news outlet. It is a shame that a reliable source has diluted in credibility.
Shocking reporting - personal, chat, opinion, and speculation from journalists who attempt to do .... should I expect to receive the term "gob-smacking in a news report? The news reader? There is a particular shortage of news. It has sunk dramatically—a deficient standard of reporting.
Television and Radio. BBC News is perhaps the most blatant abuse of press freedom we've ever witnessed in the US. They are obliged to investigate all politicians. However, they are content to criticize the government and then call on a member of their shadow cabinet to lam it too. One-sided, misleading reporting. Couple this with their part in generating public excitement and panic, and you've got infamous, popular toilet similar to the Sun, The Daily Mail, the Guardian, and the (not quite) Independent.
The BBC is a fan of domestic violence. That's why they've got a few pictures that show Will Smith smacking Chris Rock on their website. This is so that people can see it and think that beating their wives or husbands is acceptable.
I always pay on the day before the end of each year.
I pay for my pension, but shortly I'll be moving house and will not have a TV for a while. I don't watch much television but not much of the BBC. I pay my annual bill online. 2 weeks before the expiration icon; I receive an email. Ast a few days later, I received another reminder followed by a reminder with an obnoxious threat othe to visit my address. I always pay on the day before the end of each year. Why is it that I am constantly reminded of my license? What is the reason for pushing Disgusted
Every day, the same news is not news but transforms into HISTORY. Like BBC repeat programs, they continue to broadcast news and bulletins daily. BBC Breakfast is the worst program for this. What a scam!
Why is this WOKE news outlet encouraging the presence of Harry and Megan at Westminster Abbey? They're no longer relevant. Stop paying your license fee to them and take away their funds.
When I am watching Euronews this morning and the Live coverage from the World Economic Forum, I ask whether I can find these on BBC. It's not the case. Poor quality journalism and a bias toward the sport. This is a good illustration of how the channel cannot provide live coverage of major world issues.
This is an entirely self-serving and biased company
This is an entirely self-serving and biased company. There are no reports, BBC opinions given, not even severe information on the news that should be on the front page (for instance, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine). Instead, the BBC market itself and treat the British people as stupid fools and have over-paid presenters who are ego-driven. It's about time the BBC was put in the same pit as dinosaurs, and ped stopped allowing them the right to rob funds to finance 1diiots such as Liniker and Kunnsberg and Kunnsberg. It's utterly ridiculous. I'd rather watch the EU news and am a Brexit vote.
BBC news, you're an absolute shame. There is a conflict in Ukraine that has many casualties every day. Many are conscripts who would not like to serve in the army. What's the story on BBC today's news? There's an upcoming football championship in Qatar that does not allow gays. Who are those on the BBC interviewing? Gay and LGBTV individuals about why they're not pleased with this. It's their country, and if you disagree with their laws, it's their issue. BBC If it came to my fault, I'd shut you down in a flash.
BBC are far worse than daily newspaper arsewipes and the daily mail
BBC is far worse than daily newspaper arsewipes and the daily mail. They are highly right-wing bias reporting issues reported from 2022 to 2020 and are ongoing. A prime example of disturbing coverage comes from Leciester among Pakistani and Indian cricket enthusiasts. However, the BBC put an Islamic spin on it to claim it was Muslims opposed to Hindus! They'll twist any facts to fit their right-wing agenda of bias. It's no wonder that people have stopped paying the fee for licenses.
BBC News staff are radical Socialist awakes! Their coverage of the news is wildly biased. It is all about the wants and desires of the lowest 20% of people in the UK, The uninformed, the insecure, or the less smart, who live off benefits from the cradle until the grave. They are covered from wall to wall by the demands of those who receive benefits, food banks, etc. All day long.
An example of this is the constant coverage of the wants and needs of tenants. I've seen on numerous stories on the UK market for rental properties that they've got guests representing tenants and tenant-rights organizations such as Shelter and Shelter. Still, they do not have anyone representing landlords and developers of property. Landlords are constantly portrayed as greedy.
Tenants are consistently praised, and landlords are constantly criticized. It's a great illustration of how, on every channel, the BBC promotes a radical socialist-Marxist agenda. The BBC's well-off staff do this because they're on the government's payroll. They've never earned any profit in their lives and do not have respect or concern with the commercial or entrepreneurial sector.
BBC South today has become the most progressive and leftist program. They criticize their white English heritage and will always interview a non-white first and possibly the next. They're anti-tory government and Brexit, but they keep insisting on climate change—biased and unacceptable reporting. I don't have an issue with them interviewing black or ethnic minorities, but why can they always ask them to be interviewed first? The only acceptable reporter is the reporter for the transport, Paul Clifton. The evening's program has begun precisely as stated.
There are some exceptions. Locally-owned radio stations appeal more to me than national stations. My team's name is Notts. However, I am too far away to go to matches [the nearest game could be more than 200 miles round distance and over 200 miles round trip.
The website provides me a crucial link, but why do Notts matches always appear last on the list? They're not the last in alphabetical order; however, even though they're in Div 2, they're in the top tier. Commentaries are fantastic: they're not mentioning names, but they're knowledgeable and write beautifully.
My team's name is Notts. With some exceptions, the local stations on the radio are better than their counterparts in the national media. However, I am far enough away not to be able to attend matches (the closest fixture is more than 200 miles round distance and over 200 miles round trip.
This website has a crucial link, but what is the reason Notts games always seem to be at the bottom of the list? They're not in the top position alphabetically; however, even though they're Division 2, they're in the top tier. Commentaries are fantastic: they're not mentioning names, yet they're knowledgeable and can describe beautifully.
In my initial conviction, the BBC tried to provide unbiased and reliable reports on recent events.
However, after some research, I find that this is not the reality.
There is a distinct tendency to favor conservatives in all aspects of politics and an apparent disdain that borders on hatred for those who support nationalism.
I am sorry to say that I have lost faith in the BBC and, unfortunately, there is no star alternative for my choice.
BBC News is an operational business division of the British Broadcasting Corporation responsible for collecting and broadcasting current and news stories.
A terrible choice
A terrible choice by the BBC to combine the two news channels. A lot of technical issues or poor hosts, lower-quality information (i.e., the Radio 5 Live phone show in the middle of the morning), and so on. It's disappointing that they must search different media outlets for information to pay. News is an essential feature for a public-funded broadcaster. It is time to eliminate all the rubbish programs aimed at the 'popular' segment of the market. Ensure that standards are maintained; otherwise, the BBC has no reason to continue paying the worldwide license cost!
Never seen the news
I usually go to BBC News mid-morning when I am off at work. What has changed for me? Now we have Nicky Campbell sitting with headphones, talking to an interview on the radio. !!!! It's not a talk show on the phone that I could listen to at the radio station if desired (which isn't the case). !)!! I've never seen the news before 11 am since the switch, and I won't do it from now on!!
I'm looking forward to watching the life stories and the breaking news of the day!
Low-quality English
I'm from the United States, as do many of my buddies, and I used to tune into BBC World Service. I'm a native speaker. However, the quality of spoken English has become so poor that I cannot understand the language. My acquaintances who speak English as another language feel it's gone downhill throughout most programs. Many cannot comprehend low-quality English and don't wish to imitate bad accents from other regions. In general, BBC has become a shame, and while we used to enjoy it, we are now opposed to it.
Unwatchable
BBC News has become unwatchable and was once the news channel of choice; however, the biases are apparent not just in the content they broadcast but in what they don't say. They are supposed to provide the entire population of its license holders, not only those who want to speak with them.
The other muppets of the media.
They should be embarrassed by themselves and all other media outlets causing massive panic buying fuel in the UK with false information. They must hold accountable, together with the other muppets of the media.
The standard for independent news reporting.
I used to believe the B.B.C. news was the standard for independent news reporting. Now, I believethinkact the opposite is true. It's a constant stream of information being pushed out and made appear normal. Shame on you, B.B.C.
They don't think that an invasion is worthy of coverage.
The media is always talking about perceived racism and BLM however, they haven't said anything is said about the thousands of undocumented immigrants who have entered America this year. They don't think that an invasion is worthy of coverage.
I am slightly unhinged
I am slightly unhinged. I am a screaming, far-correct mouth breather who likes to hear about things I like and suffers from incontinence and Erectile dysfunction. I also love blaming people from the left, foreigners, or ethnic minorities for all the problems that happen in this world. If there's one thing I don't like about it is hearing different views of others. This is why I am a snob about the BBC and all that it represents. I've also been persuaded to write this review, believing it will have a lite impact and that the average person doesn't care a lot.
I'm wondering if this kind of journalistic style
The entire media BBC mainly, is awash with negativity and depressing stories and contributes to mental health. The last few years have been highly traumatizing, yet instead of reporting positive news (and there's some positive news), it seems that all they're trying to do is scare people. I'm wondering if this kind of journalistic style (during both world wars) would have led people to beggar their existence instead of in the aftermath of war, where people gathered and were inspired with the help of the media. I pay for a license from a tv company whose programming I don't watch. How can you help people understand instead of making them feel down with your doom-and-gloom reportage?
I used to depend on the BBC news.
I used to depend on the BBC news. The first thing I checked each morning was getting a broad overview of the news in the morning in bite-sized pieces. Day, I feel it's more magazine fashion, where people are constantly interviewed on trivia or stories unrelated to actual news events. It's a bit unprofessional. It's boring and always follows the official line, and it is challenging to grasp the meaning of the news during the limited time to spare at the beginning of my day. I have now switched to ITV, which I previously would never have been able to watch. Sorry BBC, but over the past 18 months, BBC breakfast has gone out of its way.
The last time they did get the weather right was Michael Fish and the great storm.
Following the promise of severe weather with thunder and torrential rain in the southwest region, we did not get rain and no thunder. Instead, we sweated another time at 30 degrees. We are looking towards cooling down from the scorching heat. When the weather forecast said we'd be blessed with this gorgeous rainy day, we were grateful to them. It's hard to tell how they managed to get this wrong. The last time they did get the weather right was Michael Fish and the great storm.
These left-wing whinge champagne socialists
These left-wing whinge champagne socialists. Any media organization that claims, "We report our version of the news," should stop operations. Then, BBC I', ve put off paying my BBC fee for propaganda. What are you going to do? Why should I pay the price for this anti-Whitanti-Whitepro-British agenda? I'm looking forward financial smack in the backside coming soon to you, BBC.
A media that is among the worst corrupt media outlets in the world.
A media that is among the worst corrupt media outlets in the world. It is not a reliable source of information. I've been living in the UK for the past three years, and this TV Chanel has me thinking intensely about the media I have in my home country. Unfortunately, my country is one of the countries that were once communist in Europe; therefore, I am sure that I'm terrified about my departure to a nation that isn't much different from any other communist nation across the globe. They have different slogans but the same goal. It's so sad.
DBBC has been through its fair share of bad days.
DBBC has been through its fair share of bad days. Downright sloppy, just like today, the lady said an unintentional swear word, and the newsreader attempted to stop her, and the video apologized to the viewers. Hoping GB news will take over BBC news. News is a Bias new media that always tries to appear politically correct.
They should be treated that way.
BBC News or BBC generally hasn't been helpful to me in times of need. It. They are selfish, kaminey kutte saale harmi papai, money-spy. I would advise others not to use them. They will. not report your news or any story. They should be treated that way.
BBC news and reportage have not served its use for years
BBC news and reportage have not served its use for years. Instead of following its mission and reporting neutrally, the station is biased and utilizes the platform to push its interests.
The BBC coverage of making an issue that is national in this minor incident.
Unexpectedly, however, BBC news is similar to other for-profit news organizations because their articles are designed to draw attention to the general public rather than necessary information and news. For example, today's extensive coverage of the white/black controversy over a basic written conversation between a white lady and a close friend of royals. Three entities are responsible in the case of the white person not being able to respond appropriately to an appropriate question about the family of a person and their national origins, as well as the black woman not comprehending the issue of the white person, and participating in a transparent investigation, and finally, the BBC coverage of making an issue that is national in this minor incident.
I click news for an update on my tablet.
I click news for an update on my tablet. Bbc asks me to sign up or log in to view Coronavirus's update. I have a license and am registered to access players, so I'm telling bbc to should stop! The fact that they are monitoring me on all devices is disturbing. I'll get my news from other sources.
It is a shame that a reliable source has diluted in credibility.
For many years BBC news has been my primary source for reliable news; however, over the past year, I have seen more and more opinion-driven, sensationalized content like the else news outlet. It is a shame that a reliable source has diluted in credibility.
A deficient standard of reporting.
Shocking reporting - personal, chat, opinion, and speculation from journalists who attempt to do .... should I expect to receive the term "gob-smacking in a news report? The news reader? There is a particular shortage of news. It has sunk dramatically—a deficient standard of reporting.
They are obliged to investigate all politicians.
Television and Radio. BBC News is perhaps the most blatant abuse of press freedom we've ever witnessed in the US. They are obliged to investigate all politicians. However, they are content to criticize the government and then call on a member of their shadow cabinet to lam it too. One-sided, misleading reporting. Couple this with their part in generating public excitement and panic, and you've got infamous, popular toilet similar to the Sun, The Daily Mail, the Guardian, and the (not quite) Independent.
The BBC is a fan of domestic violence.
The BBC is a fan of domestic violence. That's why they've got a few pictures that show Will Smith smacking Chris Rock on their website. This is so that people can see it and think that beating their wives or husbands is acceptable.
I always pay on the day before the end of each year.
I pay for my pension, but shortly I'll be moving house and will not have a TV for a while. I don't watch much television but not much of the BBC. I pay my annual bill online. 2 weeks before the expiration icon; I receive an email. Ast a few days later, I received another reminder followed by a reminder with an obnoxious threat othe to visit my address. I always pay on the day before the end of each year. Why is it that I am constantly reminded of my license? What is the reason for pushing Disgusted
BBC Breakfast is the worst program for this.
Every day, the same news is not news but transforms into HISTORY. Like BBC repeat programs, they continue to broadcast news and bulletins daily. BBC Breakfast is the worst program for this. What a scam!
Stop paying your license fee to them
Why is this WOKE news outlet encouraging the presence of Harry and Megan at Westminster Abbey? They're no longer relevant. Stop paying your license fee to them and take away their funds.
Poor quality journalism
When I am watching Euronews this morning and the Live coverage from the World Economic Forum, I ask whether I can find these on BBC. It's not the case. Poor quality journalism and a bias toward the sport. This is a good illustration of how the channel cannot provide live coverage of major world issues.
This is an entirely self-serving and biased company
This is an entirely self-serving and biased company. There are no reports, BBC opinions given, not even severe information on the news that should be on the front page (for instance, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine). Instead, the BBC market itself and treat the British people as stupid fools and have over-paid presenters who are ego-driven. It's about time the BBC was put in the same pit as dinosaurs, and ped stopped allowing them the right to rob funds to finance 1diiots such as Liniker and Kunnsberg and Kunnsberg. It's utterly ridiculous. I'd rather watch the EU news and am a Brexit vote.
They're not pleased with this
BBC news, you're an absolute shame. There is a conflict in Ukraine that has many casualties every day. Many are conscripts who would not like to serve in the army. What's the story on BBC today's news? There's an upcoming football championship in Qatar that does not allow gays. Who are those on the BBC interviewing? Gay and LGBTV individuals about why they're not pleased with this. It's their country, and if you disagree with their laws, it's their issue. BBC If it came to my fault, I'd shut you down in a flash.
BBC are far worse than daily newspaper arsewipes and the daily mail
BBC is far worse than daily newspaper arsewipes and the daily mail. They are highly right-wing bias reporting issues reported from 2022 to 2020 and are ongoing. A prime example of disturbing coverage comes from Leciester among Pakistani and Indian cricket enthusiasts. However, the BBC put an Islamic spin on it to claim it was Muslims opposed to Hindus! They'll twist any facts to fit their right-wing agenda of bias. It's no wonder that people have stopped paying the fee for licenses.
BBC News staff are radical Socialist awakes!
BBC News staff are radical Socialist awakes! Their coverage of the news is wildly biased. It is all about the wants and desires of the lowest 20% of people in the UK, The uninformed, the insecure, or the less smart, who live off benefits from the cradle until the grave. They are covered from wall to wall by the demands of those who receive benefits, food banks, etc. All day long.
An example of this is the constant coverage of the wants and needs of tenants. I've seen on numerous stories on the UK market for rental properties that they've got guests representing tenants and tenant-rights organizations such as Shelter and Shelter. Still, they do not have anyone representing landlords and developers of property. Landlords are constantly portrayed as greedy.
Tenants are consistently praised, and landlords are constantly criticized. It's a great illustration of how, on every channel, the BBC promotes a radical socialist-Marxist agenda. The BBC's well-off staff do this because they're on the government's payroll. They've never earned any profit in their lives and do not have respect or concern with the commercial or entrepreneurial sector.
BBC South today has become woke and leftist
BBC South today has become the most progressive and leftist program. They criticize their white English heritage and will always interview a non-white first and possibly the next. They're anti-tory government and Brexit, but they keep insisting on climate change—biased and unacceptable reporting. I don't have an issue with them interviewing black or ethnic minorities, but why can they always ask them to be interviewed first? The only acceptable reporter is the reporter for the transport, Paul Clifton. The evening's program has begun precisely as stated.
They're knowledgeable
There are some exceptions. Locally-owned radio stations appeal more to me than national stations. My team's name is Notts. However, I am too far away to go to matches [the nearest game could be more than 200 miles round distance and over 200 miles round trip.
The website provides me a crucial link, but why do Notts matches always appear last on the list? They're not the last in alphabetical order; however, even though they're in Div 2, they're in the top tier. Commentaries are fantastic: they're not mentioning names, but they're knowledgeable and write beautifully.
Commentaries are fantastic
My team's name is Notts. With some exceptions, the local stations on the radio are better than their counterparts in the national media. However, I am far enough away not to be able to attend matches (the closest fixture is more than 200 miles round distance and over 200 miles round trip.
This website has a crucial link, but what is the reason Notts games always seem to be at the bottom of the list? They're not in the top position alphabetically; however, even though they're Division 2, they're in the top tier. Commentaries are fantastic: they're not mentioning names, yet they're knowledgeable and can describe beautifully.
You can't trust that the BBC to be objective
In my initial conviction, the BBC tried to provide unbiased and reliable reports on recent events.
However, after some research, I find that this is not the reality.
There is a distinct tendency to favor conservatives in all aspects of politics and an apparent disdain that borders on hatred for those who support nationalism.
I am sorry to say that I have lost faith in the BBC and, unfortunately, there is no star alternative for my choice.